// -*- mode:doc; -*- // vim: set syntax=asciidoc: === Infrastructure for virtual packages [[virtual-package-tutorial]] In Buildroot, a virtual package is a package whose functionalities are provided by one or more packages, referred to as 'providers'. The virtual package management is an extensible mechanism allowing the user to choose the provider used in the rootfs. For example, 'OpenGL ES' is an API for 2D and 3D graphics on embedded systems. The implementation of this API is different for the 'Allwinner Tech Sunxi' and the 'Texas Instruments OMAP35xx' platforms. So +libgles+ will be a virtual package and +sunxi-mali-utgard+ and +ti-gfx+ will be the providers. ==== +virtual-package+ tutorial In the following example, we will explain how to add a new virtual package ('something-virtual') and a provider for it ('some-provider'). First, let's create the virtual package. ==== Virtual package's +Config.in+ file The +Config.in+ file of virtual package 'something-virtual' should contain: --------------------------- 01: config BR2_PACKAGE_HAS_SOMETHING_VIRTUAL 02: bool 03: 04: config BR2_PACKAGE_PROVIDES_SOMETHING_VIRTUAL 05: depends on BR2_PACKAGE_HAS_SOMETHING_VIRTUAL 06: string --------------------------- In this file, we declare two options, +BR2_PACKAGE_HAS_SOMETHING_VIRTUAL+ and +BR2_PACKAGE_PROVIDES_SOMETHING_VIRTUAL+, whose values will be used by the providers. ==== Virtual package's +.mk+ file The +.mk+ for the virtual package should just evaluate the +virtual-package+ macro: --------------------------- 01: ################################################################################ 02: # 03: # something-virtual 04: # 05: ################################################################################ 06: 07: $(eval $(virtual-package)) --------------------------- The ability to have target and host packages is also available, with the +host-virtual-package+ macro. ==== Provider's +Config.in+ file When adding a package as a provider, only the +Config.in+ file requires some modifications. The +Config.in+ file of the package 'some-provider', which provides the functionalities of 'something-virtual', should contain: --------------------------- 01: config BR2_PACKAGE_SOME_PROVIDER 02: bool "some-provider" 03: select BR2_PACKAGE_HAS_SOMETHING_VIRTUAL 04: help 05: This is a comment that explains what some-provider is. 06: 07: http://foosoftware.org/some-provider/ 08: 09: if BR2_PACKAGE_SOME_PROVIDER 10: config BR2_PACKAGE_PROVIDES_SOMETHING_VIRTUAL 11: default "some-provider" 12: endif --------------------------- On line 3, we select +BR2_PACKAGE_HAS_SOMETHING_VIRTUAL+, and on line 11, we set the value of +BR2_PACKAGE_PROVIDES_SOMETHING_VIRTUAL+ to the name of the provider, but only if it is selected. ==== Provider's +.mk+ file The +.mk+ file should also declare an additional variable +SOME_PROVIDER_PROVIDES+ to contain the names of all the virtual packages it is an implementation of: --------------------------- 01: SOME_PROVIDER_PROVIDES = something-virtual --------------------------- Of course, do not forget to add the proper build and runtime dependencies for this package! ==== Notes on depending on a virtual package When adding a package that requires a certain +FEATURE+ provided by a virtual package, you have to use +depends on BR2_PACKAGE_HAS_FEATURE+, like so: --------------------------- config BR2_PACKAGE_HAS_FEATURE bool config BR2_PACKAGE_FOO bool "foo" depends on BR2_PACKAGE_HAS_FEATURE --------------------------- ==== Notes on depending on a specific provider If your package really requires a specific provider, then you'll have to make your package +depends on+ this provider; you can _not_ +select+ a provider. Let's take an example with two providers for a +FEATURE+: --------------------------- config BR2_PACKAGE_HAS_FEATURE bool config BR2_PACKAGE_FOO bool "foo" select BR2_PACKAGE_HAS_FEATURE config BR2_PACKAGE_BAR bool "bar" select BR2_PACKAGE_HAS_FEATURE --------------------------- And you are adding a package that needs +FEATURE+ as provided by +foo+, but not as provided by +bar+. If you were to use +select BR2_PACKAGE_FOO+, then the user would still be able to select +BR2_PACKAGE_BAR+ in the menuconfig. This would create a configuration inconsistency, whereby two providers of the same +FEATURE+ would be enabled at once, one explicitly set by the user, the other implicitly by your +select+. Instead, you have to use +depends on BR2_PACKAGE_FOO+, which avoids any implicit configuration inconsistency.