[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/postgis: bump version to 3.3.1

[Maxim Kochetkov]

On 21.09.2022 23:15, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2022 09:20:23 +0300
> Maxim Kochetkov <fido_max at inbox.ru> wrote:
> 
>> Release-notes: https://git.osgeo.org/gitea/postgis/postgis/src/tag/3.3.1/NEWS
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maxim Kochetkov <fido_max at inbox.ru>
>> ---
>>   ...kefile.in-do-not-force-static-linkin.patch | 23 ++++++++++---------
>>   package/postgis/postgis.hash                  |  2 +-
>>   package/postgis/postgis.mk                    |  2 +-
>>   3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/package/postgis/0002-raster-loader-Makefile.in-do-not-force-static-linkin.patch b/package/postgis/0002-raster-loader-Makefile.in-do-not-force-static-linkin.patch
>> index 756a7c10dd..20a359fadd 100644
>> --- a/package/postgis/0002-raster-loader-Makefile.in-do-not-force-static-linkin.patch
>> +++ b/package/postgis/0002-raster-loader-Makefile.in-do-not-force-static-linkin.patch
>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>> -From 29c33c483e22a4445d870739187d128df0f11f60 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> -From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni at bootlin.com>
>> -Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 15:12:40 +0200
>> +From 50af3f4fc2353ba35fd054060e27e034d29b1c78 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> +From: Maxim Kochetkov <mkochetkov at airspan.com>
>> +Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 09:09:44 +0300
> 
> Since you are not doing substantial changes on this patch, it would be
> nicer to preserve the authorship as it is.

Let's wait for the response from upstream.

> 
>>   Subject: [PATCH] raster/loader/Makefile.in: do not force static linking
>>   
>>   This is similar to commit
>> @@ -13,23 +13,24 @@ object XYZ".
>>   
>>   Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni at bootlin.com>
>>   Upstream: https://github.com/postgis/postgis/pull/702
> 
> Do you think you could follow-up with upstream on this? I did an
> initial fix, but that wasn't accepted as-is. However, my interest in
> postgis is limited, so I don't think I will have the chance to look
> into this in the near future.
Sure. I've just posted some comments on
https://github.com/postgis/postgis/pull/702
https://github.com/postgis/postgis/pull/598